There are times when I just have to laugh at myself.
(insert obligatory self deprecating comment about that being most of the time)
But seriously.
I'm sketching out (on paper. in pencil.) the data access layer for a project. Trying to figure out all the access methods I'll need.
I erase one to better fit another in.
I suddenly realize that I completely forgot what I'd just erased.
And it's erased thoroughly...
The first thing to run through my mind was the completely sincere thought: "Not a problem. I'll just undo.."
(ok. it was funny to me)
Friday, December 14, 2007
Friday, December 07, 2007
Internal notebook ATA100 vs USB2 vs eSATA
Holy hot hannah, batman.
I requested an external drive for my poor-little 1.6ghz pentium m notebook. (Dell Latitude D610 w/2gigs of RAM)
The internal drive (upgraded from a 4200rpm 30gig model to a 120gig 5400rpm 8mb cache seagate) was still slow. And when I tried to run a vm onboard...look out. Empires rose and crumbled to dust in the time it took to boot 'em. Everything else slowed to a crawl as the host OS and VM duked it out for access to the drive.
So I wanted an external drive. Well, for virtual machines as well as local backup.
At first I thought a nice, simple (big honkin) usb2. Then I thought "hmm...wonder how much faster an external SATA (eSATA) drive would be?)
After a bit of research, I selected the following. (all hail newegg!)
VANTEC NST-360SU-BK 3.5" eSATA + USB2.0 Enclosure
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 (500GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA Hard Drive
VANTEC UGT-ST350CB SATA PCMCIA Card
Everything went together like a charm. On a whim, I decided to run Simpli Software's awesome HDTach against my internal drive, the external drive using it's eSATA connection, and the external drive using it's USB2 option.
Note the cpu utilization differences (as well as the fact that the eSATA option is faster than the internal...guess that PCMCIA bus can move some data..!)
Internal drive (Seagate ST9120821A - ATA100, 120gig, 5400rpm, 8mb cache):
Average read speed: 31.4MB/sec
CPU Utilization: 5%
External Drive, (7200rpm, 16mb cache) using usb2 (onboard)
Average read speed: 27.3MB/sec
CPU Utilization: 29%
External Drive, (7200rpm, 16mb cache) using eSATA interface
Average read speed: 56.2MB/sec
CPU Utilization: 0%
HDTach results:
The notebook's internal drive:

The external drive, USB2:

The external drive, eSATA
I requested an external drive for my poor-little 1.6ghz pentium m notebook. (Dell Latitude D610 w/2gigs of RAM)
The internal drive (upgraded from a 4200rpm 30gig model to a 120gig 5400rpm 8mb cache seagate) was still slow. And when I tried to run a vm onboard...look out. Empires rose and crumbled to dust in the time it took to boot 'em. Everything else slowed to a crawl as the host OS and VM duked it out for access to the drive.
So I wanted an external drive. Well, for virtual machines as well as local backup.
At first I thought a nice, simple (big honkin) usb2. Then I thought "hmm...wonder how much faster an external SATA (eSATA) drive would be?)
After a bit of research, I selected the following. (all hail newegg!)
VANTEC NST-360SU-BK 3.5" eSATA + USB2.0 Enclosure
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 (500GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA Hard Drive
VANTEC UGT-ST350CB SATA PCMCIA Card
Everything went together like a charm. On a whim, I decided to run Simpli Software's awesome HDTach against my internal drive, the external drive using it's eSATA connection, and the external drive using it's USB2 option.
Note the cpu utilization differences (as well as the fact that the eSATA option is faster than the internal...guess that PCMCIA bus can move some data..!)
Internal drive (Seagate ST9120821A - ATA100, 120gig, 5400rpm, 8mb cache):
Average read speed: 31.4MB/sec
CPU Utilization: 5%
External Drive, (7200rpm, 16mb cache) using usb2 (onboard)
Average read speed: 27.3MB/sec
CPU Utilization: 29%
External Drive, (7200rpm, 16mb cache) using eSATA interface
Average read speed: 56.2MB/sec
CPU Utilization: 0%
HDTach results:
The notebook's internal drive:

The external drive, USB2:

The external drive, eSATA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
